Article summary and response Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Article summary and response - Essay Example that he is against sweatshop exploitation and that it should be a collective moral duty to bring the system to an end or to improve it for the benefit of the workers. Meyers begins the article by detailing the arguments against the exploitation of sweatshop workers. The first argument is quite simple, which is that people believe that exploitation practices such as these are morally wrong and should not be implemented in any workplace. Another argument comes from the philosophy of Kant that states that people should not be used â€Å"as a means but always as an end in itself (Meyers, 2007).† This means that it is immoral for employers to take advantage of workers who are desperate and in need of even the slightest bit of money. Meyers then goes into the idea of a basic golden rule, stating that if an individual would not want to be exploited in such a way, then it should not be right for another person to be similarly exploited. The final point that Meyers brings up in regard to those opposing sweatshop exploitation surrounds the fact that the CEOs of these companies are bringing in millions of dollars per year, while their underpaid employees are only bringing in a couple of dollars each day. As such, it should be the moral responsibility of the CEOs to realize that they are making more than they need to survive, and what is left over should be given to the underprivileged employees. Meyers makes it known that CEOs might find this to be unfair, but Meyers stands by the thought that unfair and doing the right thing will often go hand-in-hand. On the side that favors sweatshop labor and exploitation, the greatest argument about whether or not the system is moral or immoral is that the majority of these workers are not being forced into these jobs. They are not being forced to stay in these positions or to accept the meager pay. Due to this, there is no violation whatsoever of human rights. It is their right to decide if they want to work in a sweatshop or not,